That Hard Feeling of “Not Selected”: Why Photographers Must Embrace Rejections

Because unseen doesn’t mean unloved, and rejection isn’t the end.

The Sting of Silence

You have sent your best entries to a photo contest or call for submission, and really looking forward to a positive response. You wait—days turn into weeks. Then finally the shortlist comes out. You scroll through the list—sometimes as long as 100+ photographers. Your name isn’t one of them. You frantically check for a response in your inbox, including spam. But there is none.

That hollow silence, that gnawing feeling of “NOT SELECTED” often casts a pervasive sense of rejection – quietly questioning your creative identity. I know, it is a very hard feeling to digest, and make peace with, because our photographs aren’t just pixels or prints. They’re pieces of us—our vision, our story, our way of making sense of the world. When those images are overlooked, it feels as if we are being overlooked.

I recall one particular instance recently where my submission did not receive even a mention among 414 selected photographs. At first, the weight of that number felt overwhelming—hundreds of images celebrated, and mine left invisible. It was difficult to process, especially when my own sense of quality and craft seemed at odds with some of the chosen works.

But here lies an essential truth: photography, like all art, is inherently subjective. What strikes one juror as evocative may appear ordinary to another. Sometimes, selections reflect thematic alignment more than technical brilliance; at other times, they highlight experimentation over convention. None of this diminishes the value of the images not selected—it simply illustrates the wide spectrum of perspectives through which art is viewed.

This realization shifted my own perspective. Rejection was no longer a statement of failure but a reminder of how deeply personal and interpretive the creative process is. My work had not lost its worth. The photograph that meant something to me still carries the same weight and value, whether anyone noticed or not.

Your photograph doesn’t lose its value just because it didn’t make a shortlist.

The Subjectivity of Art

Here’s the thing about art—it’s profoundly subjective. What one curator finds moving, another may dismiss as unpolished. One jury may fall in love with muted tones, another with bold color.

• Some critics early in Cartier-Bresson’s career viewed his images—his street, candid, decisive moments—as ‘too spontaneous’ or seemingly accidental.
• Diane Arbus’ direct, unflinching portrayals of marginal figures led to descriptions of her work as ‘grotesque’ by certain critics—yet those images are now seen as powerful contributions to modern photography.

The same image that’s rejected in one space or time can be celebrated as genius in another. The difference? The eyes that see it.

Sometimes your work may be simply ahead of its time. What seems unconventional today may be groundbreaking tomorrow. Vivian Maier’s street photographs, unnoticed during her life, are now celebrated worldwide. Similarly, Vincent van Gogh created more than 2,000 works, yet sold only a handful while alive. His bold colours, emotional brushwork, and expressive style were dismissed in his era as strange and unpolished. Today, both Maier and van Gogh are celebrated globally—proof that rejection, or even obscurity, does not necessarily reflect the true value of an artist’s vision.

So when your photo isn’t selected, it doesn’t mean it lost its value overnight. It simply means it didn’t align with a particular set of tastes of a particular jury in a particular time.

“Rejection is not a verdict on your worth—it’s often just a reflection of numbers, subjectivity, and timing.”

The Numbers Game

Let’s put rejection into perspective with simple math.

Say a contest receives 5,000 entries. Only 100 are selected. That means 4,900 images will go unrecognized. You could have been number 101, and it would still feel like rejection. Often, your work simply gets lost amid thousands of entries or is pre-screened by organizers before it ever reaches the jury. It’s important to remember that those handling the initial rounds may not always have a discerning eye or a heightened sense of aesthetics, making the outcome more about circumstance than a reflection of your talent.

When Robert Frank first published The Americans, critics in magazines like Popular Photography condemned it as sloppy — citing technical ‘blur, muddy exposures, drunken horizons, and general sloppiness’ — and many found the style unpolished or disturbing. Yet, over time, The Americans has come to be regarded as one of the most influential photography books of the 20th century.

Sometimes it’s not about the quality of your work—it’s simply the about the number of efforts you take. A single submission, no matter how strong, may go unnoticed. To increase your chances of recognition, it’s essential to keep sending your images to as many contests, exhibitions, and publications as possible. If your work has true substance, it will eventually catch the attention of discerning eyes—perhaps not this jury, but another. Every submission is a step toward visibility and validation, and with each effort, you improve the odds that your vision will be seen, appreciated, and celebrated. Persistence, in this sense, becomes as critical as talent itself.

It takes only one moment, one acceptance, one breakthrough for your work to find its place. Think of Steve McCurry’s Afghan Girl—instantly iconic, but only after countless years of unseen work behind the scenes.

One ‘yes’ can outweigh a hundred ‘no’s.

The Blessing in Disguise

Early in your photography journey, rejections are not merely setbacks—they are valuable opportunities for reflection and growth. Each instance of non-selection allows you to step back, reassess your techniques, refine your craft, and develop a distinctive style that helps your work stand out among countless similar images.

Rather than letting ego dictate that our work is already perfect, it’s crucial to embrace these moments as lessons, recognizing that no work is ever beyond improvement. By viewing rejection as a constructive mirror rather than a verdict, you create the space to evolve, experiment, and ultimately strengthen the individuality and impact of your photography.

Rejection is not a verdict on your talent—it’s an invitation to refine your craft, experiment boldly, and develop a style that is unmistakably your own.

Rejection Has Many Faces

Rejection in art does not always arrive as a blunt letter from a gallery or a missed shortlist in a competition. Often, it comes in subtler forms—criticism, misunderstanding, or lack of recognition. Sebastião Salgado, for instance, faced harsh accusations of “aestheticising misery,” with critics questioning the ethics of his work even as it gained global attention. Steve McCurry, before creating some of the most iconic images of our time, struggled to get editors’ attention and faced countless moments of people refusing to be photographed, testing his resolve. Even within the history of photography, artists like Alma Lavenson were urged by peers to abandon their chosen style in favour of prevailing trends, a reminder that creative voices are often dismissed before they are celebrated. These “soft rejections” may not appear on a scoreboard or an award list, but they cut just as deep. They remind us that rejection wears many faces—and surviving it is often what shapes an artist’s voice.

What is remarkable is not the rejection itself, but what followed. Sebastião Salgado, once criticised for “beautifying misery,” went on to receive the prestigious W. Eugene Smith Grant and the Prince of Asturias Award, his work now regarded as both humanitarian and visionary. Steve McCurry, who struggled for assignments in his early years, eventually captured Afghan Girl, one of the most iconic magazine covers in history. Alma Lavenson, despite early dismissal of her soft-focus approach, earned her place in exhibitions alongside Ansel Adams and Edward Weston, later celebrated for her unique vision. Their journeys remind us that today’s criticism or invisibility does not define tomorrow’s legacy. Rejection—whether loud or silent—was merely one chapter in a much larger story of resilience and recognition.

Every great photographer has a graveyard of rejections behind them.

Redefining Success

Competitions, exhibitions, and magazines are only one way for your work to be seen. They’re not the only measure of value. Some of my most meaningful feedback hasn’t come from juries, but from strangers who stumbled upon my photos and wrote to say, “This image moved me.” or “This image inspired me to create a painting out of it.” If your photograph moves you—or even one other person—it already holds meaning.

That is success, too. Maybe even the kind that lasts longer in the heart than your CV.

Competitions are just one platform. The true value of your work is in the emotions it stirs.

A Ritual for Resilience

So, how do you keep moving when the sting of rejection is fresh? Try this five-step ritual:

1. Acknowledge the sting. Write down exactly what you’re feeling—“I feel invisible,” “I feel dismissed.” Naming emotions reduces their weight.
2. Reframe the context. Remember it’s often just numbers. You weren’t chosen this time—but that doesn’t erase your worth.
3. Shift the spotlight. Ask yourself: Why do I love this image? Write three reasons. Anchor its value in your own eyes.
4. Create a micro-win. Share the rejected photo on your blog or Instagram, print it for your wall, or show it to a friend. Don’t let it gather dust.
5. Recommit. Close with a mantra: “Rejection is redirection. My work continues.” Then submit again, shoot again, create again.

This ritual doesn’t erase rejection—but it transforms it into fuel.

---

Remember, the world may not recognize your photograph or style today. But that doesn’t make it any less valuable. Keep creating, keep submitting, keep believing. Because unseen is not unworthy.